|
Key performance
indicators for Lean Manufacturing Excellence
by S. “Mani” Manivannan,
Ford Motor Company
Automotive industries are
faced with many of the same pressures as other industries, but that
doesn’t mean the same old “solutions” will work every time
Are Key Performance
Indicators (KPI) metrics driving or killing your business?
A manufacturing truth—
“You cannot change that which you do not measure.”
What is KPI?
KPIs, or key performance indicators, help organizations achieve
organizational goals through the definition and measurement of progress.
The key indicators, agreed upon by an organization are variables that
can be measured to reflect the success of processes or initiatives. The
KPIs selected must reflect the organization’s goals, they must be key to
its success, and they must be measurable. Key performance indicators
usually are long-term considerations for an organization.
Metrics: When we use
the term metric, we are referring to a direct numerical measure that
represents a piece of business data in the relationship of one or more
dimensions. An example would be: “gross sales by week.” In this case,
the measure would be dollars (gross sales) and the dimension would be
time (week.) For a given measure, you may also want to see the values
across different hierarchies within a dimension. For instance, seeing
gross sales by day, week, or month would show you the measure dollars
(gross sales) by different hierarchies (day, week, and month) within the
time dimension. Making the association of a measure with a specific
hierarchal level within a dimension refers to the overall grain of the
metric. Looking at a measure across more than one dimension such as
gross sales by territory and time is called multi-dimensional analysis.
Key Performance Indicators
are measurable, definable metrics typically used to signify company
goals. KPIs are considered to be primary metrics. Key Performance
Indicators, when exposed and properly analyzed can be used to understand
and improve manufacturing performance.
Every company measures
themselves to some degree. Often, measurement and analysis occur based
on historical information. Although there is value in historical
analysis, KPIs are biased toward real time data and are used to support
decisions that enhance manufacturing performance. KPIs are tied to
company goals and require careful design and implementation in order to
support positive change. As with many organizational issues, acceptance
of Key Performance Indicators and how they will be used to improve
performance is critical.
A KPI is simply a metric
that is tied to a target. Most often, a KPI represents how far a metric
is above or below a pre-determined target. KPI’s usually are shown as a
ratio of actual to target and are designed to instantly let a business
user know if they are on or off their plan without the end user having
to consciously focus on the metrics being represented. For instance, we
might decide that in order to hit our quarterly sales target we need to
be selling $10,000 worth of widgets per week. The metric would be widget
sales per week; the target would be $10,000. If we used a percentage
gauge visualization to represent this KPI and we had sold $8,000 in
widgets by Wednesday, the user would instantly see that they were at 80
percent of their goal. When selecting targets for your KPI’s you need to
remember that a target will have to exist for every grain you want to
view within a metric.
A new handbook released by
the Manufacturing Enterprise Solutions Association (MESA) shows that
manufacturers that leverage technology to measure KPIs have an edge in
managing their operations, yet very few manufacturers effectively manage
their performance. Only 3 percent of study respondents report very
effective links between operations KPIs and business metrics. This means
that most companies’ management teams do not have views that accurately
represent progress and plant contribution.
See the reference from
ISO/TS16949 for the critical importance of KPIs:
ISO/TS16949 (2nd edition), 8.4: Analysis of Data:
The analysis of data shall provide information relating to
a) Customer satisfaction
b) Conformity to product requirements
c) Characteristics and trends of process and products including
opportunities for preventive action, and
d) Suppliers
The simple fact to keep in
mind is, “Any KPIs without proper analysis and action plan to improve
the same are not useful.” This should drive the selection process for
KPIs.
If the goals on the KPIs are
not being met, have an action plan in place (documented) to meet or
exceed the goals. See the ISO/TS16949 coverage on planned results not
achieved and action plan.
ISO/TS16949 (2nd edition),
8.2.3: Monitoring and measurement of processes:
The organization shall apply suitable methods for monitoring and, where
applicable, measurement of the quality management system process. These
methods shall demonstrate the ability of the processes to achieve
planned results. When planned results are not achieved, correction and
corrective action shall be taken, as appropriate, to ensure conformity
of the product.
You will often have more
than one objective/metric for any specific process. There are
externally-focused metrics (effectiveness) and internally-focused
metrics (efficiency). Often I think about quality (e.g., satisfaction of
the customer of the process with what they receive), cost (productivity,
etc.) and delivery (e.g., cycle time).
However, one key caution
here is to make sure that you don’t have too many metrics. There are
organizations with literally 120-plus metrics. Needless to say, they
weren’t managing them very well. They spent all their time in
measurement and had none left over for management and review. The Pareto
principle rules again.
The first thing is to
Identify Key Processes for the Organization.
These are based on the Type
of Organization. For example, in a manufacturing organization the Key
Processes would be:
1- Planning
2- Purchase
3- Stores
4- Production
5- Quality (Internal/External)
6- Engineering
7- Maintenance
8- Research & Development (Innovation)
9- Marketing, etc.
Generally, an organization
will have certain goals, such as “Achieve turnover of 100 percent over
last year,” “Reduce customer returns,” etc. Then, based on these company
goals, the Individual KPIs for each process can be defined.
The key here is that
individual KPIs should be aligned and linked to company goals to ensure
they have real impact on the effectiveness of the overall KPIs.
For the above-mentioned nine
key processes, each process can have 1 or 2 KPIs that are monitored by
their respective process owners at an ongoing fixed frequency. These
results are then reviewed by top management. This review serves to
identify the gap by using Current State vs. Future State metrics with
proper action plans to achieve the strategic objective.
Disconnects between
financial and operational metrics abound. A metric may seem perfectly
logical to one pocket of the organization, but when taken in context,
even a person who has done a reasonable job of identifying the right
metrics and aligning these throughout the organization may find they
cannot shift behaviors to improve performance. To achieve this KPI
metrics latency, information systems truly do need to span from sensors
to the boardroom, like dashboards for example. Organizations that hope
to remain in manufacturing need to invest in systems to gather and
analyze data quickly and, ideally, automatically.
The study from MESA
indicates that over 60 percent of respondents report that they gather
less than 10 percent of the data collected for their operations metrics
in a fully automated way. Manual and spreadsheet data collection methods
to feed metrics are still fairly common in most plants.
They also need operational
support systems that pinpoint what changes will trigger the desired
future state improvements, and guide the process owners and employees to
perform to best practice process standards.
Here is an example of a
dashboard report:


Along with KPI automated dash board report out, an Andon system is
beneficial. So what is Andon? It simply means “light” in Japanese. An
Andon is any visual indicator signaling that a team member has
encountered an “abnormal situation,” that can not be resolved without
preventing a stoppage (as defined by takt time). Poor quality, lack of
parts information or tools may cause an abnormal condition.
Key to effective andons is that they are visual and support “management
by sight” before the KPI data hit.
In a study conducted by the
Aberdeen Group study, participants were asked which KPI metrics were
most important to achieving success. Close to 80 percent of
best-in-class companies cited “On-time Delivery” among the top three
metrics. Next was “Inventory turns,” with 52 percent; then
“Manufacturing cycle time,” with 39 percent. On-time delivery is
considered a process metric because it includes the time that takes to
accept and process a customer order, manage through production, and ship
to the end customer.
Reducing Non Value Added (NVA)
manufacturing and supply chain costs was recognized by 66 percent of the
respondents as one of the most important strategic action relative to
pursing Lean. Value Stream Mapping (VSM) is the technique of choice for
accomplishing this goal. VSM has evolved over time from simplistic flow
charts to Current State Mapping to Future State Mapping. KPIs are the
tools that identify “gaps” where improvement is needed.
When an organization
achieves its order-to-delivery measures, generally this means that each
participant company or division that added value met its KPI individual
metrics. And although order-to-delivery may not link directly to
strategic objectives, it is a strong contributor to customer
satisfaction, which is measured by virtually all companies. Better
performing companies also believe that their ability to successfully
meet “First Time Through (FTT)” quality goals is an KPI indicator of
future product quality and efficiency.
Selecting your KPIs
When you select/review KPIs for each area, make sure they are relevant
to the area! (In many study cases, the goals set by management had
nothing to do with the area/process involved.) Obviously, this is a
recipe for failure.
Six Sigma/Define Measure
Analyze Improve Control (DMAIC) problem solving methodology is highly
recommended when selecting the KPIs and their action plans.
Define:
• Define the goal as defined by your business/strategic plan.
• For the goal/strategic plan, what are the possible indicators you
could use to determine process improvement?
Measure:
• Is there existing data (internal/external) available that measures any
of the listed KPIs that will tell if you are improving the process? (Yes
or No) If yes, what is the source of the data?
• Are there any additional needs, special circumstances, hindrances or
other factors that may impact obtaining or collecting the data? (Yes or
No) If yes, please explain.
• How often are you going to collect, report, and summarize data?
• KPI must be measurable.
Analyze:
• Collected data should be analyzed by the process owners to determine
the “future state.”
• Timeliness of data analyze is crucial to move onto next steps.
• The simple fact to keep in mind is, “Any measurement without proper
analysis and action plan to improve the same is not useful.” This should
drive the selection of process for measurements.
Improve:
• Are you able to use the KPI data collected to improve the process?
• Select one to three KPIs, state the goal in quantifiable language
(reduce, increase, implement).
• What best practices have you identified to compare and improve your
process?
Control:
• Analyze data to determine success: Objective has been met, needs to
monitored? (Yes or No)
• Did data produce information needed? (Yes or No) Keep KPI or replace
with new KPI: Keep/Modify/Replace?
• Revise Strategy/goal?
Importance of Key
Performance Indicators levels:
KPIs provide a hierarchy for delivering relevant performance-related
information to different levels within an organization so the right
people can access the right information at the right time. Collected
lower-level KPIs can be easily combined and rolled up to create
higher-level KPIs that can reflect more specific strategic/business
objectives. Such higher-level KPI measures therefore do not have to be
directly measured. Instead, they can simply be summed from previously
collected KPI measures. A performance KPI measure hierarchy also
represents an excellent diagnostic performance measurement system for
meaningful KPI. Higher-level KPI measures can also be easily decomposed
to lower-level elements when attempting to zero in on a problem area.
KPI measure levels:
Shown below is a typical example of KPI levels for a machining operation
that need to be considered to review the true value of First Time
Through (FTT) efficiency from operation #10 to the final product. You
need to be able calculate the Overall Equipment Efficiency (OEE), Cycle
Time and Scrap in order to get a true value of final product First Time
Through (FTT).

Follow the recommended steps of KPI measure level creation:
• Define needed types of performance-related information that can help
achieve desired performance levels
• Develop a relevant and usable family of KPI measures
• Develop specific performance measurement hierarchies
What does your management
group feel is the difference between an effectiveness indicator and an
efficiency indicator?
In order to successfully leverage performance improvements based on KPIs,
there are three main precursors:
• Measurability
• Team acceptance
• Conformance to organizational goals
Measurability
The KPI must be measurable. The methodology of the measurement must be
documented and accepted before the process begins. Understanding exactly
what is to be measured will help determine how it will be measured. The
effects of changes can be tracked through careful analysis of the
benchmark KPI data. Goals and desires are often vague — key performance
indicators are always very specific.
Team acceptance
Team buy-in is often the difference between success and failure of many
manufacturing projects. Buy-in is critical to KPIs. KPIs are typically
the primary source of information regarding the performance of a process
that is being monitored. In order to successfully use the data, everyone
needs to understand why the indicator was chosen and how it represents
the underlying condition. Additionally, since the data will be used as
an indicator of process performance, it is necessary that the entire
team use it in the same way.
Conformance
General company goals and initiatives are at the heart of KPIs. By
determining a way to measure the success of a project, companies are
able to monitor change. When action is required, KPIs will provide
advance warning. Successful KPI implementation means limiting exposed
performance data to only key indicators. Often there may be a desire to
measure the entire process. While this is understandable, the difference
between KPI and other metrics must be understood and enforced.
KPI provides a mechanism for companies to identify areas for
improvement, create the metrics that will be used to analyze the process
and the tools to support change to the future state. Lean manufacturing
is a process. Companies that use KPIs in this context use them to
improve every day.
How can KPIs help my organization?
Once you’ve defined the KPIs that reflect your company’s goals and have
a consistent way to measure them, use them to enhance performance by
charting the progress toward the target KPI. Only then will people be
informed and motivated to:
• Support company initiatives
• Manage growth
• Manage change
Here are a few examples of suggested KPIs with Lean and Six Sigma impact:
|
KPI Measure |
Lean Impact |
Six Sigma Impact |
|
Productivity |
Eliminate Non-Value Added work and
increase throughput |
Reduce rework and increase yields |
|
First Time Through (FTT) |
Zero defects |
Eliminate variation |
|
Customer Satisfaction |
Through reduced lead times, reduced
inventory costs |
Through improved product quality and
reliability |
|
Process Capability Cpk >=1.33 |
Reduce the waste |
Eliminate the variation, process
control and variation reduction
|
Process owners need a full
commitment to manufacturing disciplines such as:
1. Process control
2. Equipment reliability
3. Safety
4. On-time shipping
The entire culture of “Lean Manufacturing Excellence” can be summed up
in two key words: VARIATION REDUCTION – ELIMINATION OF MUDA
This is applicable to both the mechanical and human sides of the
performance equation.
In its simplest terms, there is only one right way to run a machine —
with discipline and knowledge. It can be statistically verified and
consistently maintained.
On the human side, the more consistently technical knowledge increases,
the more consistent daily feedback becomes (for example, by automated
dashboard data of KPI metrics). This also leads to more consistent
performance system, more consistent positive encouragement and less
performance variation.
Common lean failures:
• Lack of management support
• Resistance to change (lack of buy-in) from supervision
and workforce
• Poor lay out metrics
• Not enough training
• Little or no impact on profitability
• Ineffective communications
• Not able to sustain initial efforts
• Not expanding improvement from the initial efforts
to other
departments/processes
• Improvements in one area seemed to have negative
impacts in others
In general, if you have correctly located the current constraint,
improving it will increase total output (from the company, department,
process, product and/or machine). While improving an area that is not
the current constraint may have certain benefits, it will not improve
total output. If you have improved enough, the improved entity will no
longer be the current constraint. We call this process “eliminating the
current constraint.” This doesn’t mean it will go away completely though
because when one current constraint is eliminated, it gives way to
another. When you find it, your goal will be to eliminate it. This
process of constraint elimination with appropriate KPI metrics will be
repeated until you are satisfied with the current output level and can
monitor it with applicable KPIs.
Eliminating constraints is
an ongoing battle!
Subramaniam “Mani”
Manivannan is a Quality Coach/Assessor – PTO Quality manufacturing
process and product support engineer for Ford Motor Company in Dearborn,
Michigan. He can be reached by e-mail at:
smanivan@ford.com.
Back to
top
Back to Web-exclusive articles archives
|