|
The
two great myths of distribution selling
by
Scott Benfield
Any
good chili maker knows that if you don’t stir the pot now and then,
you won’t like the end result. So it goes with the pot of knowledge
vs. practice, and experience vs. perspective. If we lose the ability
to stir our own complacency and invigorate our thinking, the good
stuff may just sink to the bottom and burn.
|

Attention distributors!
Maximize
your sales force’s productivity. The new book Restructuring
the Distribution Sales Effort for Maximum Productivity,
from distribution industry consultant Scott Benfield and Progressive Distributor editor Rich Vurva is available now. Did you know that inside and outside
sales forces are 30% to 40% of the typical distributor’s
operating expenses? To
learn more about this important book, click here.
|
|
Distributors
are at point in time when they need to stir the pot. They need to
challenge the sales culture, examine a few of its practices and ask
themselves some tough questions. There are more than enough signals
from customers that the sales game needs to change. The wholesale firm
may just be on the third generation of driving an old model of
business, and the unmixed chili we’re serving up is weak, our
customers are tired of it and we’re not living off of it as well as
we could.
Great
sales myth No. 1: Customers want to be sold
Sellers have a trump card defense when it comes to justifying their
existence. It’s called “relationship.”
Just about anytime I’ve tried to challenge why wholesalers
put the most expensive part of the marketing mix (personal sales)
behind commodity products, I am trumped by “relationship.”
It makes no difference that there is almost no tangible
measurement to the “R” word; it only has to be said and sellers
automatically assume the King of the Hill position that they have held
for the last 75 or so years. Granted, it takes familiarity with the
customer and the element of trust to establish key account
relationships (I used the R word!). However, many customers may be
rethinking what they get from distribution sellers and are looking for
less invasive, more convenient ways to transact business and a little
less “R.”
My
reasoning for this relies on two areas of study and their
implications. First, a
recent survey of industrial MRO buyers (Progressive Distributor,
May/June ’01) found that 48 percent answered “no” when
asked, “Do you want distributor salespeople calling on you?” Mind you, there will always be some customers who say
“no” to a sales call. But if the average cost of an outside sales
force is 4 percent of sales, and 48 percent are not wanted, the math
(48 percent of 4 percent) frees up 1.92 percent. This could almost
double the earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) of the average
distributor.
Of
course the math is never quite so easy. Some customers actually want
sellers and some transactions need to be manned on the outside. For
those in a quandary of just where, how, and why manned selling needs
to occur, I’ll point you to an interesting book: Rethinking
the Sales Force. The authors, Neil Rackham and John De Vincentis,
propose three basic models of selling including transactional,
consultative and enterprise. For distributors, their positions on
selling are more than sales deployments but substantial redesigns of
how distributors go to market. In short, there are new models of
business underneath the sales classifications, and wholesalers can
benefit from the read.
Beyond
this, I would suggest careful study and reading of functional sellers
and segment-based sales forces vs. the typical geographic mode.
Functional sellers (missionary, trade, new product, and technical) are
product classifications. Segment sellers are specific to a defined
market group. These definitions and classifications are quite old (30
years or so) but many wholesalers still hold on to the geographic
sales model even though its usefulness is questionable.
The
Progressive Distributor survey points out the need for
distributors to plow more time into services, including delivery, post
sales “customer service,” technical support and the ever present
“price.” The need for
service research in distribution is real, and the second reason I
challenge the need of the outside seller is my own work in service
(satisfaction and loyalty) research.
I
have conducted this type of research on distributor customers for 10
years and have gathered similar results. In 15 to 20 service
variables, outside sales product knowledge, solving problems, and
relationships rank low on influencing overall satisfaction or
repurchase intent. The results are gathered by qualified
statisticians, with reasonably sophisticated statistical techniques
and random samples. And, regardless of the industry vertical (industrial,
HVAC/R, PVF, plumbing, building materials) the results are largely the
same. Customer satisfaction and repurchase intent, largely, aren’t
driven by outside sellers but by the quality, robustness and
uniqueness of service. Without good service measurement and an
understanding of service marketing, however, wholesalers are shooting
in the dark when it comes to changing to the new areas of value
provision.
If
you agree that customers want to be sold is a substantial myth, then
the question remains what to do with sellers?
Many, maybe most, wholesalers are loathe to let go of
salespeople. Many prefer to take the silent way out and not replace
sellers that retire or leave. A few more progressive souls will take
the advice of Jack Welch (former General Electric CEO) who, in a
recent interview at a Northeast school of business, essentially said
the old “belly to belly” was coming to an end. His advice was to
reassign and retrain and make better jobs for obsolete sellers. What,
how, where, and when to reassign are just now beginning for many
wholesalers. The new models will take time, demand courage and require
revising change plans numerous times.
Great
sales myth No. 2: Our sellers know the market
It is nearly impossible for one person to know the market.
Most distributors serve numerous segments that, by definition,
have different product, price and service needs. If Wholesaler A
serves six segments that value 20,000 line items and a dozen service
offerings differently, the math (6 x 20,000 x 12) gives 1.44 million
product/service combinations that the seller purports to know.
Price
differentiators include product cost, segment (type of customer), size
of customer, location of customer (geographic competition) and the way
products are handled (stock, non-stock and direct). Therefore, knowing
the market price becomes an impossible job. Why? Consider Wholesaler A again with six segments, three customer sizes
(small, medium, large), four different competitive geographies and
three ways to handle products. The permutations of pricing become
impossible because (6 x 3 x 4 x 3 x 20,000) gives 4.32 million pricing
combinations that the seller should know.
Of
course this is not feasible. It is most likely why much wholesaler
pricing is based on cost rather than market factors. Cost, in short,
is the only common denominator. Cost-plus pricing, as most sellers
know, is a bad thing. But now they can defend why they do it. What is
impossible for the individual mind, however, is possible for the
information technology system to perform. Arranging pricing matrices
by segment, customer size, geography and handling can go a long way
toward capturing important price differentiators. I call this type of
IT system pricing a managed pricing system or a market-based pricing
system.
The
upshot of managed pricing is to build pricing quality into the system
and not try the futility of inspecting 4.32 million transactions for
their pricing appropriateness. Yet many wholesalers still have
designated inspectors of pricing compliance with literally no clue to
the impossibility or futility of their job.
Most
wholesalers concede that their IT systems must perform reasonably
complex economic order quantity calculations and forecasts on the
products they buy. Wholesalers spend more time beating price out of
the vendor and forecasting demand on the buy side than capturing
margin in managed pricing on the sell side. This perpetuates the myth
“our sellers know the market.”
It also reflects an inadequate understanding of the market’s
complexities.
Managed,
professional marketing can go a long way toward solving what to know.
Service research, managed pricing systems, product management and
marketing analysis can give the average wholesaler keen insight into
the what, how, where and how much of unique segments. Unfortunately,
wholesaler marketing is dominated by sellers turned instant marketer,
left without any real clout, or just plain misunderstood and
under-funded.
Getting
rid of the myths
Marketing puts a method and research on studying the customer before
the sales call is made. While somewhat nebulous, marketing has a
structure, discipline and science. The best companies fund marketing's
creation and perpetuation. Then, they give it.
Marketing
can be taught, learned and applied. There are wholesalers who have
done good marketing work and a few that actually fund it and give it
power. Most wholesalers, unfortunately, want to reside in the land of
sales myths. If earnings trends are any indication, the land is
becoming a not so profitable place to reside.
Many
wholesalers point to the fact that their businesses have held a
reasonably constant and substantial portion of the gross domestic
product (25 percent or more). What they don’t say, and many don’t
realize, is that an EBIT of 2 percent in most distribution businesses
has a return on equity that is the same or less than an equity index
mutual fund. They also don’t say or realize that their firms have
less diversification and liquidity than the same fund. Entire vertical
markets of wholesalers have fallen below an average 2 percent EBIT.
The question that almost no one asks is, “Why brag about holding 25
percent or more of the GDP when earnings are going south and the
equity of three generations is a less-than-average return?”
Are wholesalers bragging about doing something that most
investors wouldn’t do?
I
could say that wholesaling has always been a low-profit business and
always will be. This is a copout. It’s time to stir the pot to help
distributors move from the great sales myths to the better land of
managed marketing that makes financial sense.
Scott
Benfield is a consultant to distribution. He has authored three books
on wholesaler and channel marketing and dozens of magazine articles.
His newest book is called Pricing
Management: Capturing Value for Distributors. He can be reached at
Bnfldgp@aol.com or (630)
429-9311.
back to top
back to online exclusives |