Nothings changed
Our second annual survey shows that in an industry where change is a constant topic, there has been little change in how distributors teach their salespeople to deal with an evolving marketplace.
by Chuck Holmes
According to Progressive Distributors second annual sales training survey:
1) The probability is no better than 50 percent that you actually budget your sales training.
2) Odds are that whatever sales training you do is very much like the sales training youve been doing for years.
3) If you are a large company, youre more likely to be dissatisfied with the results of your sales
training than if you are a small-
or medium-sized company.
4) If you are in the smallest
category ($2 million or less in
annual sales), theres a good chance that you havent done sales training in the last year. Two-thirds of your peers havent.
In fact, the most striking result from the 1998 sales training survey conducted by
Progressive Distributor and Corporate Strategies Inc. is that in an industry where change is a constant topic, there is little change to be found. It seems that while distributors are quick
to recognize change in the
marketplace, there is little or no change in the way distributors
teach their salespeople to deal
with the marketplace.
The second-most-interesting result is the percent of respondents who say they provide sales training to inside and outside salespeople dropped by more than 10 percent. Interviews with some respondents indicate that the lack of sales
training is a matter of decision rather than a matter of omission.
What goes on
in training rooms
Sales training in industrial
distribution continues to be largely
a matter of seminars. For inside and outside salespeople, the most
popular delivery systems are
supplier-led seminars, on-site
seminars and off-site seminars (Figure 1). Other training
methods, such as video and
CD-ROM, are used by fewer
than a third of the respondents.
Regarding what they teach in sales training, product knowledge
continues to be the most popular (Figure 2, page 22). In fact, product training is the only subject area named by more than half of the respondents (59.9 percent). Second in popularity is basic sales skills, with 49.7 percent of the
respondents saying they provide sales skills training for outside sales and 39.5 percent for inside sales. The only other subject area
reported by as many as a third of the respondents is communications (34.7 percent).
Managing training.
Or maybe not.
Subject matter and training
delivery systems are not the only static areas revealed in the survey. There is essentially no change in how respondents say they manage their sales training.
About one-fourth of the
respondents say they do not
measure the results of their training, and more than half say they use either gross measures (before and after sales figures) or feedback from participants or customers to determine training effectiveness.
Still, as in last years survey, a
majority of the respondents say their training is either very effective or effective, and the largest companies (annual sales of $50 million or more) are more likely to be dissatisfied with their sales training than either small- or medium-sized companies.
Fewer than a third of the
respondents say they budget for sales training or capture training costs as
an item on the operating statement. Although larger companies are more likely to budget for training than smaller ones, the percentage of respondents who say they have a training budget did not exceed 50 percent in any size category. Of the companies that budget for training, about three-fourths commit 0.5
percent of gross sales or less;
however, if money were available, most would spend between
1 percent and 2 percent of gross sales
on training.
Opting out of sales training
One interesting question raised by the survey is why, in an industry famous for being sales-obsessed, did nearly a third of the respondents say they have no sales training? Interviews with several respondents indicate two primary reasons.
The first is expected; theres simply not enough time or manpower. Hurried and harried sales managers dont have time to plan an effective sales training program, and if it were planned, they wouldnt have time to implement it.
In the smallest group of companies ($2 million or less in annual sales), two-thirds of the companies conduct no sales training.
But, according to one sales
manager, lack of time is complicated by complacency on the part of
management above him and the
sales force below him.
Other companies dont conduct sales training because they dont see sales training useful in meeting their objectives. At Dynamic Tool and Abrasives (formerly J. M. Tool and Supply), an IDG company in Ferndale, Mich., salespeople are trained in product and product application, according to sales
manager Steve Priemer.
Our company deals in a very
specialized area, and the value we bring to the customer is in knowing more about the products and
solutions than anyone else, he says.
Priemer admits that additional training might be helpful, especially in areas such as time and territory management, but he says Dynamic
is meeting its goals and objectives focusing on the product and the
customer without formal training.
Tony Anderson of DoAll Industrial Supply in San Diego says he would like to have formal sales training for his sales force, but he wants to make sure salespeople think its worth
the time.
The way sales training is
generally presented, our salespeople would view it as an imposition, Anderson says. I have to find
something that makes them think the time theyre spending in training will make them more money
than that same time spent making
sales calls.
Anderson says he will continue looking for more than the usual
sales training programs.
We need to get away from
traditional sales training because
the business is no longer traditional. We need something that combines where we came from with where were going to have to go.
That would be a change.
Chuck Holmes is president of Corporate Strategies Inc., an Atlanta company specializing
in training, consulting and
market development tools for
distributors. He can be reached
at (770) 491-1239.
This article originally appeared in the
January/February 1999 issue of Progressive Distributor. Copyright 1999.
back to top
back
to sales training archives