|
Kaizen,
quick-hitting process management
by Bill
Gaw
Total Customer Satisfaction, Theory of Constraints, Materials
Requirement Planning, Enterprise Resource Planning, Just-In-Time,
Total Quality Management, Business Process Reengineering and Flow
Technology are some of the programs that have been launched in
industry over the last decade.
While some companies implementing these
programs have achieved significant advances in quality, speed and
costs, most have failed to achieve promised results.
According to
industry gurus, the winners attribute their success to adopting the
following management practices:
• creating a clear vision or strategy;
• real-time management commitment;
• a focus on processes rather than results;
• timely management support;
• effective tactical planning;
• ongoing relevant training;
• empowering a qualified program champion;
• team dynamics development;
• monitoring tactical execution;
and,
•
implementing a recognition/reward system.
Most companies employ most of these
management practices in their business. Why is it that when most
companies launch a new quality, production or inventory control
program it slowly and gradually transcends into just another failed
management attempt to improve performance?
"New programs never thrive; they just fade away" is the hallmark of such companies,
and consequently, they never reach their full growth and profit
potentials.
So if the above list of management practices doesn't really separate
the winners from the also-rans, what does? Why are some companies
successful at obtaining positive results from such programs while
other companies fail? If its not on the above list of management
practices, what is it?
A study of successful companies will invariably show they have
developed a culture of gradual, continuous improvement. This culture
provides the basis for new program implementation success.
The
Japanese call it kaizen - a management culture of gradual, continuous
improvement. We describe it as a tenacious focus on
quick-hitting, process improvements.
If you doubt the power of
gradual, continuous improvement you need to study the careers of Vince
Lombardi and Tiger Woods. Their huge success stories are testimonials
to kaizen. Vince Lombardi focused his players on the continuous
improvement of the execution of basics; that's kaizen. Tiger Woods
attributes his success to his relentless quest for a better swing, for
higher quality gamesmanship and a daily pursuit of perfection; that's
also kaizen.
In business, kaizen focuses on three
basics: workplace effectiveness, elimination of waste and
standardization. As an introduction to
kaizen, we have delineated below their most important features.
Workplace effectiveness
The 5Ss:
1.
Sort - Separate work-in-process, tools, machinery,
products and documentation into necessary and the unnecessary and
discard the unnecessary.
2. Straighten - For easy and fast access when needed, everything
has a place and everything is in its place.
3. Scrub - Keep machines and working environments clean.
4.
Systematize - Develop routine practices for cleaning and
checking.
5. Standardize - Follow procedures and standardize. Continuously
improve processes and reestablish standards.
The Five Ws and the One H
WHO - Who does it? Who is doing it? Who should be doing it?
Who else can do it? Who else should do it?
WHAT - What to do? What is being done? What should be done?
What else can be done? What else should be done?
WHERE - Where to do it? Where is it done? Where should it be
done? Where else can it be done? Where else should it be
done?
WHEN - When to do it? When is it done? When should it be
done? What other time can it be done? What other time should it be done?
WHY - Why does he do it? Why do it? Why do it there? Why do
it then? Why do it that way?
HOW - How to do it? How is it done? How should it be done? Can this method be used in other areas? Is there any other
way to do it?
Problem-solving tools
1. Pareto diagrams - Used to display the relative importance of all of
the problems or conditions in order to choose the starting point for
problem solving, monitor success or identify the basic cause of a
problem.
2. Cause-and-effect diagrams - Used to identify and explore and
display the possible causes of a specific problem or cause.
3. Histograms - Used to discover and display the distribution of data
by bar graphing the number of units in each category
4. Control Charts - Used to discover how much variability in a process
is due to random variation and how much is due to unique events and/or
individual action in order to determine whether a process is in
statistical control
5. Scatter diagrams - Used when you need to display what happens to
one variable when another variable changes in order to test a theory
that the two variables are related.
6. Graphs - There are many kinds of graphs employed depending on the
shape desired and the purpose of analysis. Bar graphs compare values
via parallel bars, while line graphs are used to illustrate variation
over a period of
time. Circle graphs indicate the categorical breakdown of values;
radar charts assist in the analysis of previously
evaluated items
7. Checklists - Used to gather data based on sample observations in
order to begin to detect patterns. This is the logical point to start
in most problem-solving cycles.
Kaizen calls for use of the full PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, Action)
problem-solving cycle. PDCA demands that team members not only
identify problem areas but also identify the causes, analyze them,
implement and test new
countermeasures and establish new standards and/or procedures.
Standardization objectives
1.
Represent the best, easiest and safest way to do a job.
2.
Offer the best way to preserve know-how and expertise.
3.
Provide a way to measure performance.
4.
Show the relationship between cause and effect.
5.
Provide a basis for both maintenance and improvements.
6.
Provide objectives and indicate training goals.
7.
Create a basis for audit or diagnosis.
8.
Provide a means for preventing recurrence of errors and
minimizing variability.
The "If not, why not
- 5 Whys" checklist
Operator
1.
Does he follow standards?
2.
Is his work efficiency acceptable?
3.
Is he problem-conscious?
4.
Is he responsible? Accountable?
5.
Is he qualified? Experienced?
6.
Is he assigned to the right job?
Machine/facilities
1.
Does it meet production requirements?
2.
Does it meet process capabilities?
3.
Is the maintenance effective?
4.
Is the inspection adequate?
5.
Does it meet quality requirements?
6.
Does it make any unusual noises?
7.
Is the layout effective?
Materials
1.
Is there excess work-in-process?
2.
Is the right material in the right place at the right time?
3.
Is there rework and scrap?
4.
Is there any wasted materials?
5.
Is the handling efficient?
6.
Is the work-in-process damaged?
7.
Is the layout effective?
8.
Is quality standard adequate?
Operations method
1.
Are the work standards effective?
2.
Are work standards upgraded?
3.
Do methods produce a good product?
4.
Is it an efficient method?
5.
Does the sequence of work create a smooth flow?
6.
Is setup time minimized?
7.
Are the temperatures and humidity acceptable?
8.
Are the lighting and ventilation adequate?
9.
Is there adequate contact with the previous and next process?
Kaizen keeps you thinking
and proactive in your pursuit to improve. Bottom line results come
slowly but surely and these incremental gains eventually add up to a
significant competitive advantage. The spirit of kaizen can also
provide innovative actions that can yield amazing breakthroughs in
speed, quality and cost.
Without kaizen, you and your employer will gradually become complacent
and accept the status quo as your business culture. As we see it, the
lack of kaizen in a business culture is the primary cause of new
program failures and the downfall of many companies.
Kaizen Training for anyone
... anywhere ...anytime.
Back to top
Back to Web-exclusive articles archives
|