|
Gage calibration: When in doubt send
it out
by Michael S. McCue
Nothing
lasts forever, and so it is with gage accuracy and repeatability. Drop
them enough, subject them to the rigors of manufacturing plants, or
mar their measuring surface. Sooner or later,
gages need to be re-calibrated.
Most quality-conscious machinists and
inspectors will agree on this, but how gages get calibrated, who
calibrates them and where it is performed is a subject worthy of
discussion.
Aside from
the obvious quality pitfalls of using gages that aren’t accurate,
avoiding calibration can become very costly in other ways as well. For
example, decreased productivity or losing contracts due to lack of
measuring compliance or certification are factors few can afford to
risk in today’s extremely competitive environment.
With high stakes such as these, one might assume
that proper resources, methods and budgets are commonly deployed for
calibration programs. On the contrary, it is fairly typical for users
to make the mistake of attempting to calibrate their own gages using
the wrong methods and/or tools for perceived savings and convenience.
It’s easy, right?
Some people think calibrating is a quick and simple fix. They may
grab a few gage blocks, perform a hasty inspection using crude
measurement principles and assume they’re done.
"What they don’t
take into account is record keeping, training, follow up, maintenance
of master standards, environment, official procedures and other issues
that effect proper calibration,” said Dexter Carlson, chief
inspector and head of the calibration laboratory for The L.S. Starrett
Company in Athol, Mass. “People are often misinformed on what tools
and methods are acceptable for performing calibration”.
In-house calibration -- especially comprehensive,
established programs in large companies that have thousands of gages
-- can be a very effective approach for the right application. However,
outsourcing calibration is perhaps the most prudent method for many
companies for a variety of reasons, among the most prominent being
cost and competence.
Outsourcing reduces cost and
increases reliability
If you are committed to proper calibration, outsourcing will save
money and headaches. Chuck Shaw, general manager of Starrett
Calibration Services, a 13-person unit arm of Starrett dedicated
to calibration and repair of all major brands of gages, concurs.
“After you factor in the cost of hiring qualified technicians, buying
sophisticated equipment, training and record keeping, all of which is
essential to guarantee certifiable results, it is surely no small
expense to do it yourself ,“ said Shaw.
Indeed, Shaw estimated the break-even
expenses for those brave enough (or large-scale enough) to attempt it
in-house at well into the thousands.
“At minimum, you’re talking
around $250,000 for initial ramp-up with equipment, depending
on your application. Then probably another $100,000 for a few
technicians. And that’s not including other issues like taking up
valuable manufacturing space to build a climate-controlled lab. I’d
estimate that it would cost more than $75,000 annually to operate
an in-house lab. In other words, unless you have a tremendous number
of gages, it is cost prohibitive to set up an in-house calibration
operation,” said Shaw.
Standard problems, quality solutions
Dave Friedel, general manager of Webber Gage, illustrates how
expensive it can be to calibrate your standard gage blocks in house.
“If you wanted to achieve a low level of uncertainty, such as +/- 2
or 3 millionths of an inch, this would require you to send a master
set of blocks directly to NIST," said Friedel. "The cost could be astronomical; up
to $40,000 for a full set of inch and metric masters. The sensible
alternative would be to send your blocks to an accredited laboratory
that has already paid the expense to have their master blocks
calibrated through NIST. The savings can be significant. Typical
costs to calibrate gage blocks range from $2 to $5 per block
for a commercial laboratory vs. $80 per block when calibrated by NIST.”
Cost isn’t the only advantage when outsourcing.
Other critical issues, such as standards, also come into view.
“Are
you an A2LA 17025 accredited source? An appropriately accredited lab
will ensure that you meet compliance with today’s standards.
Consider also that today’s standard may change tomorrow. Keeping up
with the continually changing requirements is difficult at best for
those who aren’t plugged in and unfamiliar with the process,” said
Shaw.
Other obvious benefits are improved quality,
reliability and convenience.
“It’s safe to conclude that if
you are consistently using a dedicated, independent source, your
quality will increase,” said Shaw. “Plus, larger companies
benefit by standardizing their gage calibration and record keeping all
within one source.”
Who will do what?
Before you send those gages out, the best advice is to be careful.
There are several options, based on your needs. Depending on the work
required, you could send the gage back to the manufacturer or maybe to
a lab.
“The problem with going back to the manufacturer is most of
them don’t have comprehensive calibration and repair services, so
they end up recommending you a new gage or maybe a discounted one,
their motives being obvious," said Shaw. “Check to see if they
have an established repair and calibration program with thorough
procedures.”
Another problem with going to the manufacturer is
multiple sourcing.
“If you have gages from different manufacturers
like most people, it becomes difficult trying to send tools to various
sources. Be sure they can handle all major brands of gages in one
location”, said Shaw.
Other risks are the type of lab. You may find a
good house, perhaps even a specialist in certain product areas, but
beware of size. It is not uncommon to see smaller one- or two-person
outfits close up shop. Also, look for adequate equipment, experience
and ability to service effectively.
“A good guideline for turnaround
is a minimum of three and a maximum of 10 days,” said Shaw.
Nothing’s perfect
Of course there are a few downsides to outsourcing.
“When your gages
leave the plant, you are without means to measure if you don’t have
a backup plan. You also need to schedule accordingly or you’ll
interrupt production,” said Carlson.
Although it’s rare, a gage
can even be lost in transit, or if not packaged properly, damaged. But
the alternatives are costly and difficult with questionable
results.
“The bottom line is what type of value do you put on
quality and customer satisfaction?” said Shaw.
Back to
top
Back to Web-exclusive articles archives
|