Using vibration analysis to grease
motors?
by John C. Robertson
The thought of lubricating electric motors is controversial because the method used does
not provide clear-cut instructions for lubricating bearings without over-greasing.
In fact, 86 percent of motor failures in a Strategic Work Systems case study plant
were attributed to over-greasing. With this in mind, we performed a study to
simplify motor bearing lubrication by using vibration analysis to determine the point of
grease cut-off.
The study was conducted on an 85-horsepower, 3,600-rpm motor fitted with open-face ball
bearings to provide an easy path for the grease to pass through the bearings to
demonstrate a grease overfill. Upon overhauling the motor and cleaning the bearings,
they were hand-packed with sufficient grease to prevent seizure during run-up of the
motor.
Before running the motor, the drain plugs were removed from the bearing cap wells to vent
off any excess grease that might accumulate during the greasing process. These drain
vents were kept open for around 30 minutes after completion of the greasing.
The motor was started and allowed to reach its operational temperature before making any
attempt to further grease the bearing.
The analyzer was set to record pressure impulse readings with the filter in the
"filter out" mode, and the time tracing mode was selected. The pickup stem
was attached to the accelerometer and the amplitude range set in the upper one-third of
scale on the amplitude meter. The analyzer was started and the trace allowed to
stabilize before greasing began.
As the grease was injected into the motor's inboard bearing, a count was started to
determine the number of grease gun strokes needed to correctly fill the bearing and
cavity.
As the grease took effect in the bearing, the trace took a downward plunge. When
sufficient grease was injected, the trace curved and began to track upward. At this
point, greasing was stopped and the trace was allowed to stabilize. The motor was
stopped, and the end bell removed to inspect the effects of the greasing. The
bearing showed the correct amount of grease had been added without bleeding into the
motor's windings. The appropriate amount of grease added via the gun was 15 strokes
(20 strokes = one ounce of grease).
The motor was reassembled and another test was conducted to observe the effects of
over-greasing. Forty-four strokes were admitted to the outboard bearing. The
tracing was observed, and the potential cut-off points noted. No grease was observed
at the drain vents, but the bearing's vibration began to increase noticeably during the
greasing's latter stages. This is a typical response of a bearing to over-greasing.
The motor was stopped, and the end bell removed. Grease overfilled the end cap
cavity, forced its way through the bearing and was in the process of entering the
rotor/stator air space.
A complete set of vibration spectrum data was taken to verify bearing integrity before and
after greasing. A very low 8x rpm amplitude was noted before greasing the inboard
bearing. This was indicative of the eight rolling elements that comprised the
bearing. After greasing, it showed no evidence of further degradation.
A petrochemical plant in Alberta, Canada, used this method to grease motor bearings over a
one-year trial period. The plant saved $65,000 in grease costs and saw a sharp
decline in motor failures due to over-greasing. This also led to increased plant
productivity and reduced maintenance costs.
Based on the results of our initial tests and subsequent applications, we recommend using
vibration analysis for determining proper amounts of grease in critical electrical motors
over 1 horsepower.
John C. Robertson is the maintenance reliability specialist
for Strategic Work
Systems, a consulting firm based in Greenville, S.C.
This article appeared in the December 1999/January 2000 issue of MRO Today magazine.
Copyright 2000.
Back
to top
Back to Uptime archives
|