|
Selecting
brushes
Tips
on how to choose the right abrasive brush for the application
by
Imre Karetka
The
unavoidable and unintentional byproduct of manufacturing practices is
the generation of burrs and sharp edges. Besides the safety hazards
associated with burrs and sharp edges, their presence adversely
affects the functionality and performance of the manufactured
component.
Manufacturers
resort to a number of methods to remove these unwanted attributes.
Deburring practices can be classified into two groups: mechanical and
chemical deburring. Common methods to mechanically deburr parts
include: sanding, tumbling, sandblasting and brushing. All of these
methods have advantages and disadvantages. One of the biggest
disadvantages is the cost associated with the purchase of specific
equipment. Perhaps the most economical solution to mass deburr
manufactured parts using current equipment is the use of power
brushes.
The
industrial applications of brushes vary from paint removal and
deburring to honing and polishing. These surface-conditioning tools
are used on a wide variety of materials including aluminum, steel,
carbide, wood and glass. The advantages of brushes include
flexibility, durability and repeatable uniform results. The physical
designs as well as some of the available adapters (Photos A and B)
make these tools readily adaptable to machinery widely used in
today’s manufacturing environment.
Although
a number of different brush types and configurations are available
(Photos C through F), the two major components that make up a brush
are the filament type and the mounting hardware.
The
mounting hardware introduces the filament to the workpiece. The more
important component, responsible for performing the actual deburring,
is the filament. Filament types range from artificial to natural. Some
naturally occurring filaments used in brushes are tampico, sisal and
horsehair. Use of these filaments varies according to the application.
Generally, these are not abrasive by themselves, but are used for
polishing and cleaning applications in conjunction with some sort of
abrasive compound.
The
most commonly used filament types are abrasive and crimped wire.
Examples of crimped wire filaments are steel, stainless steel, bronze,
brass, phosphorous bronze and, in rare cases, gold.
Abrasive
filaments vary from silicon carbide to aluminum oxide to
polycrystalline diamond. Depending on the grit size, these filaments
are used for deburring, polishing, blending and surface-conditioning
applications. The filament is a mixture of specially formulated nylon,
with varying grit sizes of abrasive crystals homogeneously distributed
(Photo G).
In
many cases, the filament has additives that aid with heat transfer and
moisture absorption. Because the carrier is nylon, heat is a
significant limiting factor. The use of coolant with a pH level
between 2 and 9 is strongly recommended. If liquid coolant isn’t an
option, use forced air to keep the brush cool. The melting point of
most nylon filament is 410 degrees F. At 210 F, the abrasive filament
loses 70 percent of its stiffness. When beam strength (stiffness) is
lost, the brush won’t perform as aggressively and predictably. Use
side plates or bridles to counter strength loss.
The
crystal structure in conjunction with grit size determines the
filament’s aggressiveness. Silicon carbide and polycrystalline
diamond crystals are characterized by sharp, jagged edges (Photo H).
Aluminum oxide and aluminum silicate have a more rounded crystalline
structure (Photo I).
Due
to these characteristics, a brush with silicon carbide filament is
more aggressive than a brush with aluminum oxide-impregnated filament.
The most commonly used abrasive grain sizes vary from 46 grit (coarse)
to 1,000 grit (fine). For an aggressive deburring application, use
coarse abrasive grain size. Polishing applications call for 1,000-grit
grain.
Another
consideration is industry segment. Since silicon carbide filament is
more jagged, it tends
to break off and embed into the workpiece. Because of this, many
fabricators in the aircraft industry insist on using a brush with
aluminum oxide filament rather than silicon carbide-impregnated
filament.
Wire
filament
The
most important trait when it comes to crimped wire filament is the
wire’s hardness. Generally, carbon steel wire has a hardness of
Rockwell C scale (Rc) 55-60. Stainless steel
wire is Rc 30-35. Use brass, bronze and beryllium copper filaments
where softer materials need work (rubber, aluminum) and in low
sparking applications.
The
important characteristic of wire filament is that the deburring takes
place only at the tip of the wire. Since the tip is where a sharp edge
is found, this is the only part of the wire capable of cutting.
The
large majority of brushes sold are crimped wire. Perhaps the most
important feature is its ability to break off and expose new cutting
points. If the crimped wire is compared to a wave, the breaks
generally occur at the crest and trough. These points act as stress
risers. Therefore, the initial break takes place at these points and
exposes new, sharp cutting points.
A
common application problem encountered is overpenetration. If a wire
brush is overpenetrated, the filaments act like small hammers on the
workpiece surface. The easiest way to determine if a wire brush is
overpenetrated is to examine a part after the initial deburring
application. If the part’s edge resembles a shot-peened surface,
with the sharp edge still remaining, this is correctable by decreasing
the brush penetration.
Brush
selection
When
selecting a brush, the most important questions to answer are:
•
What’s being pursued (i.e. deburring, edge break, polishing,
cleaning)?
•
What’s the workpiece material?
For
example, if the goal is to deburr a stainless steel tube that was saw
cut, use either an abrasive or stainless steel wire brush. Use a
stainless steel brush to reduce contamination on the workpiece. Where
a carbon wire brush will probably deburr the part faster, it will also
leave traces of carbon steel that cause the part to oxidize.
If
the tube is harder than 35 Rc, the only other option is the use of
abrasive filament. Depending on the equipment used and its
limitations, either a cup or radial brush will work. Usually employ
the largest brush that the equipment can handle. The benefits are
twofold. Due to the brush’s size, the part can be deburred in one
pass as opposed to two or more. The other advantage is that the brush
will be changed less frequently, leading to less machine downtime.
Remember
safety
As
with any task, safety is a paramount concern. Just as cutting tools
dull and deteriorate over time, so do brushes. After a number of
cycles, the wires fatigue, break and fall out of the brush. At various
operating speeds, these loose filaments have enough velocity to
puncture clothing and skin. For offhand deburring, use leather gloves,
a thick leather apron, a full-face shield and work boots.
Imre
Karetka is an application engineer for Osborn International. To learn
more, visit www.osborn.com or e-mail ikaretka@osborn.com.
This
article appeared in the December 2004/January 2005 issue of MRO Today
magazine. Copyright 2005.
Back to top
Back to Uptime archives
|