|
Five CMMS pitfalls
and how you can avoid
them
by Daniel
Konstantinovsky, Vishnu Raman and Mark Vick
According to many recent
research articles, only 10 percent of CMMS implementations ever
produce the desired and expected results. In this article, the
authors will help you understand the typical CMMS implementation
hurdles and give you specific advice on how you can sidestep and
overcome them.
1 - Focusing on “nice to have” features
During the CMMS evaluation and selection process, it’s very easy
(and more interesting) to focus in on the “nice to have new
features” and push the boring core features to the background.
Unfortunately, this is a recipe for disaster! In fact, The Standish
Group International reports that more than 80 percent of software
projects are unsuccessful in objectively defining requirements.
To avoid falling in this
trap, your organization must ask key people to outline detailed
scenarios of their critical processes that the CMMS must be able to
support. Once you have documented these critical processes, utilize
them as a guideline and template when evaluating CMMS solutions.
2 - Lack of top management support
All too often companies face inadequate support by top management
throughout and after the CMMS implementation process. In most
instances, this situation can be avoided if top management is kept
apprised of the financial benefits received.
To ensure continued top
management support, you need a plan for communicating the financial
achievements and benefits of the CMMS solution to top management on
a consistent and regular basis. Before beginning your
implementation, discuss and agree upon the financial indicators and
frequency for these communications.
3 - Insufficient user buy-in
When a CMMS solution fails to deliver for a company, there are
usually a few typical prime suspects as to why. Lack of user buy-in
is usually at the top of the list. However, you can drastically
reduce this risk by following a few simple steps in the beginning.
First, in the initial
stages of implementation, form a team composed of primarily CMMS
users so that the users themselves will “own” the success of the
CMMS project. Users bring a better understanding of the processes,
issues and current concerns from other users that need to be
addressed.
One more way you can
improve user buy-in is through effective communication with
end-users. In particular, your management needs to heavily emphasize
that the IT department is simply a facilitator of the solution, not
its driver, and that the goal of the system is to improve the
business, not to monitor employees.
4 - Ineffective training
Effective training of the CMMS solution is one of the best ways to
improve your chances of success. Training needs to be done prior to,
throughout, and after the implementation. The best training sessions
involve using a “train the trainer” approach and an environment as
similar to the actual production database as possible. Using a
similar database will significantly cut down on learning curve
mistakes in the future and enhance user adoptability of the CMMS
solution.
5 - Lack of clearly defined goals
This step is often overlooked or not properly addressed by many
firms. To keep your CMMS project to stay on course and maintain its
momentum, your organization needs to have clearly defined goals,
milestones and desired deliverables. Again, specific goals and a
realistic timeline need to be discussed and agreed upon for the CMMS
project to succeed.
In addition to outlining
the goals, choose a project leader who will be responsible for
keeping all parties involved towards achieving the common objective.
Ideally, your project leader should come from the maintenance
department and should have the power to make and enforce decisions.
Once you choose the
project leader and define your goals, you must next establish key
performance indicators. Outlining key performance indicators will
enable your firm to continually measure and improve your return on
investment.
Here are a few of the
most common Key Performance Indicators:
1. Return
on Investment
2. Planned vs. reactive maintenance
3. Time and money saved on paperwork reduction
4. Backlog
5. Inventory turns
6. Maintenance cost as a percentage of
equipment replacement cost
7. PM Backlog man-hours
8. Percent equipment availability
9. Sales loss due to equipment failure
10. Sales loss due to equipment preventive maintenance
11. Overtime worked against plan
12. Time taken to answer maintenance calls
13. Number of breakdowns
14. Production equipment performance
Key points to
remember
Implementing a CMMS solution is one of the most challenging projects
your organization will face. If your company has neither the time or
expertise to implement a CMMS solution, you can drastically reduce
risk and greatly improving your chances of success simply by working
with someone who has been through the implementation process before.
Working with an objective consultant will enable you to benefit from
their years of experience and knowledge gained and allow you to
focus on what you do best.
This article
was written by:
Daniel Konstantinovsky (dkonstan@veitsgroup.com),
Vishnu Raman (vraman@veitsgroup.com)
and
Mark Vick (mvick@veitsgroup.com)
of the VEITS Group, which provides information technology management
solutions to manufacturing firms. For more information, visit the
Web site at
www.veitsgroup.com. Phone: 877-834-8702.
This article appeared in the
April/May 2007 issue of
MRO Today magazine. Copyright 2007.
Back to top
Back to Maintenance excellence archives
|