Software
alone isn't the cure
by Arne Oas
So here we are, at the dawn of
a new millennium, in the formative years of the information age, and your maintenance information
software still doesn’t give you the results you want or even work
the way you want.
Orders lay around for months, even if they are finished, and then the computer isn’t necessarily updated to reflect the actual work. Forget about parts inventory
control, you don’t have a process
to track it. Getting accurate reports on cost is next to impossible.
So you’re going to upgrade, get the latest and greatest software. That way, you won’t have any excuse for not showing the return you were supposed to show when you got your first system in 1978.
Do you want to bet on whether or not you’ll get that return this time? Anyone care to guess the
reason why so many of our
computerized maintenance
management software (CMMS) applications fail to meet our
expectations?
When you decide to give up on your current software and get a new CMMS, there is a key item you must remember:
Computers don't do anything for maintenance!
That said, let’s look at the things you need to do to get the most
out of your next system, before
you select it.
First, determine what you want the maintenance
department to do in the long and short term.
Develop a plan to get there. You need to look at all your processes: work order, inventory, purchasing and reporting. Industry, economics culture and organization
structure all combine to make
your facility unique.
The maintenance application you choose must be designed to fit your processes and strategic plan or you will have to change the way your department operates.
Second, look at why your
current CMMS is not giving you the desired results.
Did you define your goals for the system up front? Did you limit them to the half-dozen or so big payback items? Did you establish a basic return on investment for the important items?
When reviewing why your
current system failed, pay very close attention to the database structure.
Is it really necessary to track
half-inch plastic ball valves as a piece of equipment? Are the
hierarchies correct? Do I care
about detailed history if I don’t have anyone who is going to analyze it or change my files? How am I getting the information into the system? How accurate is the information in the system?
You’ll find it is rarely the
application that is the real
cause for lack of results.
Next, tackle the new system design requirements and
look at the technical and
information requirements.
Review the network design,
connectivity issues, operating
system, software, hardware and Internet applications.
You should understand what
you can or can’t change and what your information technology department will support.
In addition, look at what
information you have available to you — information you would like included or tied into your new
system. How accurate is it? How will the information get into the
system? Are you going to need parts templates, CAD interfaces,
document management, ties to
controls systems or predictive
maintenance systems? The list
can go on forever.
With all that done, it’s time to evaluate your personnel and other system users. Look at their skills and technological competence. These people are the ones that make or break your CMMS.
Don’t underestimate the amount of training that will be required with the new system to get your desired results. This also means
ongoing reinforcement training.
One way the old system
probably failed was most of the department didn’t know what to do with the computer, and nine out of 10 times, the maintenance staff never saw a work order before they completed the job.
With the leg work done, it’s time to select your new technology and CMMS application, or maybe just fix the old one.
Arne Oas is the practice area manager for Computerized Facility Integration.
He can be reached at 205-918-2165.
This article appeared in the April/May 2000 issue of MRO Today magazine.
Copyright 2000.
Back to top
Back to MRO Coach archives
|