Who
needs a PPD plan?
by
Dr. Robert A. Kemp
Should
we all have Personal Professional Development Programs?
Most
of us believe supply management means creating and leading our supply
chains to ensure continuity of supply, significantly enhanced service,
total cost control and more involvement with suppliers or others to
provide our customers expected results. I for one believe this is the
absolute truth and that the key concepts for us are: to understand the
current situation; be able to visualize the demands of the future
state; and create and lead change in our organization to meet those
anticipated demands. In most cases, simply applying current knowledge
and practices will not meet the demands of the future. Therefore, we
need to be asking ourselves, “What do I need to learn to ensure my
ability to support my organization now and into the future?”
Fortunately,
there are guideposts. Professors Larry Giunipero and Robert Handfield
have identified the top trends in supply management for 2010. These
trends (see Table 1) exist now and are expected to increase in
importance. Some of these trends will shift and experience greater
rates of increase than others. If our organizations and processes are
really to become more agile and adaptable, we will need to be even
smarter and faster than anticipated.
Creative
and effective response to these environmental pressures will require
different skills than many supply management professionals have today.
For
example, the complexity of cost analysis changes completely when you
go from analyzing “What does it cost?” to “What should it
cost?” and “How can we reach the should-cost level?”
|
Table
1: Top 10 Trends for 2010
1. Pressure to reduce costs will increase
2. Strategic cost management will increase
3. Supplier selection will focus on total cost analysis
4. Electronic commerce applications will replace paper-based
systems
5. Sourcing will focus more on strategic issues
6. Global sourcing will increase
7. Strategic sourcing will increase in importance
8. Cross-functional teams will coordinate sourcing efforts
9. Sourcing management will replace order placement
10. The performance of purchasing will be more closely
monitored |
The
corollary question of “How can we buy at should-cost levels?” is
even more complex and requires improved negotiations, vastly better
relationships and other improved skills. Most of us have studied some
of these skills and have worked to improve our abilities in them, but
we need to be better across the board. To do that, we have to consider
the following questions:
1. Do we have a
consistent strategic vision of what we must be in five and ten years
to provide world class supply management processes for our
organization, its customers and its supply chains?
2. Do we have a
consistent multi-faceted professional development and professional
education program individually and collectively in our organization
with adequate budgetary support to support your vision?
3. Are we
individually or collectively members of the most appropriate
professional organizations to guide and challenge the needed
professional development programs?
4. Do we have
programs and processes to consistently address professional questions
concerning our operations to improve individual and team performance?
5. Do we have a
system of metrics and benchmarks to identify needs for professional
development, measure, evaluate and report individual and team progress
to senior leaders, individuals and teams consistently over time?
|
Table
2: 2003
ISM membership survey |
| Education
level |
Percent |
| High School
graduate |
3.1 |
| Some college |
23.5 |
| Bachelor's
degree |
37.4 |
| Some graduate
school |
12.7 |
| Graduate degree |
23.2 |
Degrees of
education
The
Institute of Supply Management (ISM) regularly surveys its members’
educational progress.
Table No. 2 shows ISM’s education demographics for 2003
(updated for 2004). The data shows that the percentage of
professionals with a supply management degree has grown to 5.5 percent
and the number with college degrees to 60.6 percent. Nearly 28 percent
said they were C.P.M.s and plan to maintain that status. An additional
13 percent hold lifetime certifications. Forty-five percent plan to
acquire the C.P.M. in the future. How does your company compare?
Similarly,
the average spend for education per supply management buyer, according
to the CAPS 2004 Cross Industry Benchmark study, was $1,026. But that
buyer spent about $19.95 million per year. The ratio of training cost
to spend ($1,026/19.95 mil) is .00005 — an extremely small sum for
education and professional development, but it’s a benchmark we can
use.
Some
estimates peg the number of supply management and related
professionals in the U.S. who belong to supply management
organizations at less than 150,000. However, U.S. Government
statistics show about 600,000 people in supply management and 600,000
more are in related professions — a membership to market ratio of
about 12.5 percent. Is this sufficient?
At least this 12.5 percent can be a benchmark.
Are
you or others in your organization members of your key professional
organizations? I firmly
believe we all should be members and that membership should be just
the beginning of our professional educational programs.
Robert
Kemp is a consultant, speaker and the former president of the
Institute for Supply Management. He can be reached at kempr@mchsi.com.
This
article appeared in the June/July 2005 issue of
MRO Today
magazine. Copyright 2005.Back
to top
Back to MRO Coach archives
|