SOP
needs for capital MRO
by
Dr. Robert A. Kemp
Several
MRO Today readers have contacted me recently, looking for information
on the creation and use of standard operating procedures or processes
for acquiring MRO capital equipment. Some asked if I knew of a sample
SOP, while others told me, “I need and want one, but time
constraints prevent it from getting created and published.”
That’s
unfortunate because it suggests uncertainty with the processes we
currently use.
Therefore,
this is the first of a series of three articles on creating and using
standard procedures to acquire MRO capital equipment. This article
will justify the process and the need. The second article will outline
an SOP to acquire MRO capital equipment, and the final article will
define training and development requirements along with process value.
To
begin this process, we need to accept the definitions and need for
SOPs. The Institute for Supply Management’s Glossary of Terms
defines “standard” as “An agreement on the definite
characteristics of quantity, design, performance, quality or
service” for something. Likewise, ISM defines a “procedure” as
“A step-by-step process or systematic way of handling regular
events.” By combining the two brief definitions, we’ll define an
SOP for this Coach series as:
“An
agreed-upon, systematic, step-by-step process for leading and
conducting all acquisition processes involving MRO capital
equipment.”
Task
403 in the ISM C.P.M. Study Guide defines procedures as one of the
“before-the-fact controls” that managers ought to use in managing
the supply process. By “before-the-fact controls,” we mean
procedures or activities that are measurable and able to be
benchmarked. Obviously, to be used by the participants in the process,
an SOP must be published, learned and readily available.
From
these definitions, I will identify five steps or processes you must
complete in order to create an SOP for acquiring MRO equipment.
Complete the steps sequentially with significant coordination and
collaboration between supply management and the other organizational
operational processes.
Step
1: Study the process to identify, define and justify all the
activities you must include. This
may include defining activities with various levels based on cost or
criticality of the item or process. Even in an SOP, we should account
for differences and provide room for ingenuity or creativity.
Step
2: Identify leaders or managers with the authority to coordinate and
approve an MRO acquisition process.
Step
3: Clearly delineate the responsibilities of users, supply managers
and others.
Step
4: Map the SOP process to display activities, systems work flow,
responsibilities, coordination between processes and decisions.
Step
5: Get managerial approval, education and training, and follow-up to
ensure the SOP is
published, available and used.
Years
ago, I learned that we could structure organizational thought
processes to provide leaders and managers liberty for creativity and
freedom of action. The table below shows where an SOP fits in this
hierarchy of thought processes.
We
must create our SOP in such a way that we foster ingenuity and
creativity even as we establish specific ways for doing things. Above
all else, we do not want our people blindly performing rote actions.
We want room for creativity, innovation and ingenuity to find a better
way.
It
seems clear that the key to survival is our competitive ability to
create profit by controlling cost. As supply managers, we are part of
a dynamic profession with increasing opportunities to contribute more
to our organization’s success.
We
must use strategic centralization of the processes for buying MRO
capital equipment to contribute more to the organization. Creating and
using an SOP to guide acquisition of such equipment is an important
step in the right direction.
To
prepare for my next article, please study your current processes in
this area in order to identify the needed activities, coordination and
approval processes.
| Managerial
Thought Process
|
Limits
to Managerial Thought
|
| Strategy
|
Significant freedom to create or interpret
|
| Objectives
|
Freedom to create and decide how
|
| Policy
|
Limited freedom to create but some
freedom to interpret and apply
|
| Standard
operating procedures
|
Little freedom to interpret with some freedom
to be creative within steps or activities
|
| Rules
|
No freedom to interpret; absolute compliance
is required |
Robert Kemp is a consultant, speaker
and the former president of the Institute for Supply Management. He
can be reached at kempr@mchsi.com.
This
article appeared in the February/March 2003 issue of MRO Today
magazine. Copyright 2003. Back
to top
Back to MRO Coach archives
|