A
value-enhancing initiative
by
Dr. Robert A. Kemp
This
is the last article in my series on evaluating suppliers and
benchmarking supplier performance to raise operational efficiencies
and effectiveness. The previous articles are posted at www.mrotoday.com.
This
article is all about you. Why should you bust your hump to evaluate
and develop MRO suppliers?
The
reason? We all want the same thing — job satisfaction. And, the
highest forms of job satisfaction come from self-direction,
decision-making, increased involvement and responsibility,
achievement, recognition and communication. So, in essence, we should
be busting our hump to evaluate and develop MRO suppliers to ensure
both success and job satisfaction. We know how to evaluate the
supplier, but we need to be better at understanding opportunities for
building
personal value from the process.
The
chart on the bottom of this page demonstrates that MRO operations can
have a profound influence on the bottom line, and how our actions
create value for the organization. We have an operation where MRO is
20 percent of the total spend before our MRO supply managers make
changes. The column titled “Before change” shows this and that net
profit was $5 million with an earnings per share (EPS) of $16.67.
Now,
let’s assume we conduct a series of evaluations and development
activities with suppliers that provide high-cost MRO items and make
several process changes to deliver a 10 percent reduction in the MRO
spend. The column titled “After change” shows MRO falls to $9
million, or only 18.4 percent of total purchases. More importantly,
the bottom line jumped 20 percent to $6 million. EPS is now $20. I
can’t imagine a CEO, owner or stock analyst that wouldn’t be
absolutely thrilled with the impact of this MRO cost reduction on the
bottom line and earnings per share.
We’ve
known for a long time that strategic organizational communication is
almost always in financial terms. In supply management, we resist that
idea. Hence, much of our conversation is tactical at best and often
ignored. Get strategic and talk CEO-speak. My example shows you have a
profound message — “EPS is up 20 percent!”
Several
things can be done simultaneously to ensure success and promote
enhanced value for suppliers, colleagues and organizations. Not
everybody agrees to any list, but my top five recommendations ensure
that organizational success enhances job satisfaction and builds
individual value.
1)
Establish clearly defined MRO objectives and metrics tied to
organizational objectives and metrics that teams manage to success.
2)
Define MRO supply management priorities in terms of strategic
organizational goals.
3)
Make teamwork meaningful by delegating authority and resources to
multi-disciplined teams and expect successful execution.
4)
Expand communication authority and eliminate boundaries that constrain
team relationships with suppliers, customers or others, internally and
externally.
5)
Provide timely feedback and recognition concerning execution and
successes. This includes access to requisite operation information
online as well as all forms of recognition, from the “one-minute
manager” to formal bonus programs.
In
addition, do the following along with our work processes to enhance
personal value and rewards:
•
Set your own objectives and get buy-in from others.
•
Establish your own priorities to earn respect and approval to include
more authority.
• Build your own networks that expand your communication base and
processes.
•
And, provide timely feedback to leaders in their language.
You
can be so valuable that they won’t think of living without you.
Our
ultimate goal from meaningful supplier evaluation processes applied
correctly and consistently over time is improved supply chain
performance that contributes value to customers, suppliers, our
organization and ourselves. When that happens, our value is enhanced.
| VALUE
TO YOUR ORGANIZATION |
| Condensed income
statement |
Before
change |
After
change |
Comments |
| Total revenue |
$100
million |
$100
million |
|
| All operations and
taxes except purchases |
$45
million |
$45
million |
Ignores some tax
increase on increased profit from change |
Purchases
Materials
MRO |
$40 million
$10 million |
$40 million
$9 million |
MRO costs drop 10
percent from supplier evaluation and development programs and
processes |
| Net profit (bottom
line) |
$5
million |
$6
million |
A 20 percent increase |
| EPS (300,000 shares) |
$16.67 |
$20 |
A 20 percent increase |
Robert Kemp is a consultant, speaker
and the former president of the Institute for Supply Management. He
can be reached at kempr@mchsi.com.
This
article appeared in the December 2002/January 2003 issue of
MRO Today
magazine. Copyright 2003. Back
to top
Back to MRO Coach archives
|