Creating
an SOP for MRO capital
by
Dr. Robert A. Kemp
In the first article of this Coach series, we
defined five steps to create a standard operating procedure (SOP) for
acquiring MRO capital equipment:
1)
Identify the organizational elements involved.
2)
Identify leaders with approval authority.
3)
Delineate responsibilities.
4)
Map the process. And,
5)
Gain approval, publish and educate the users.
This
article maps the process for creating and publishing your SOP.
We
defined an SOP as an approved process for a step-by-step or systematic
way of handling regular events. My conversations with MRO Today
readers show that procedures to guide acquisition of MRO capital
equipment (MROCE) vary from formal published documents, to documents
that are part of other acquisition SOPs, to unpublished policy, to no
established policy. We know that clarity of policy and clearly defined
procedures are beneficial to good managerial processes. I suggest many
of our organizations could benefit from a good SOP.
Some
supply managers tell me they need a published SOP for MROCE and want
one, but that time constraints preclude getting it created and
published. Unfortunately this means we don’t know if current
processes are truly the most cost-effective. One supply manager
explained his company has a very strong unpublished process for MROCE.
Tight control makes this policy work. Even so, can we be sure that our
policy is uniformly learned and applied as people and organizations
change over time?
My
map above outlines a broad process. It is generic because it is
impossible to draw a map that fits every industry or firm. This
difficulty suggests that each organization with MROCE acquisition
programs must apply creativity to make the steps identified in the map
fit its needs and processes. The map shows the process of creating and
approving the SOP for acquiring MROCE. Initially, the SOP team leads
the preparation and coordination of the SOP to gain approval and
publication. Once published, the team’s responsibilities change to
oversight and coordination as needed.

Clearly,
the supply management process must be responsible for all buying
processes and leading interaction with suppliers. Companies with large
R&D operations may want to make exceptions to this supply
management responsibility. Even so, I recommend that exceptions be
carefully weighed against the advantages of good, broad-based supply
management processes.
Responsibilities
are assigned in the map using these identity codes:
U:
The using department/agency
S:
Supply management process and its elements: buyer, commodity teams,
etc.
O:
Others such as engineering, cost accounting, finance, legal, etc.
T:
Top managers
When
sequencing identity codes in the map, the order of responsibility and
leadership is read from left to right. Thus, the assignment code USO
for initiating an MROCE request means the user is responsible for
starting the action and must coordinate the initiating process with
supply management and others.
Given
this map and the forms and processes already in place in most
organizations, we can easily write a working SOP to acquire MROCE. We
must identify our users, gain top management support, and put the
flesh of policy and procedure on the bones. Approval and testing
should be quick and we can begin to reap the benefits of an improved
process.
Earlier,
we said that our SOP is a “before-the-fact control” to guide
procedures or activities that are measurable and transferrable. Hence,
a sound SOP eliminates the costs of false starts and mistakes, and
helps us increase productivity from our hard-pressed staff. Such
activities have the potential to create profit or increase
competitiveness.
To
be most effective, you should publish, distribute, learn and, above
all else, use the SOP. Possessing a map in uncharted territory is
important, but knowing how to orient it, read it and use it are more
important.
My
next article will discuss the organizational responsibilities for
teaching, learning, distributing and utilizing our SOP.
This
article appeared in the April/May 2003 issue of
MRO Today magazine.
Copyright 2003.Back
to top
Back to MRO Coach archives
|