Questioning
supply chainsby
R.T. "Chris" Christensen Some
people are beginning to question the theory of supply chain management
— and rightly so. As
we moved into a soft economy in March 2001, problems in the
theory of supply chain surfaced. Basically, this theory states that a
relationship is established between supplier and customer, and their
customer, and their customer —
a “chain” if you will — that creates
a working partnership between all the parties involved to efficiently
bring products to market. This
is done with the intent of accomplishing two things: 1)
Reduce the time to market or the leadtime required to get material
from the raw material producer to the ultimate customer. 2) Minimize the amount of
materials in this process flow and the associated cost of maintaining
that inventory. Minimal inventory also improves the time it takes
for materials to flow through
the various processes. That
improves time to market and
meets objective No. 1. In
some cases, I’ve seen chains that are so long that they run from the
customer in the United States
to the raw material supplier
in Europe or the Pacific Rim.
Some involve seven, eight, nine or
more corporations in processing
components that lead to the finished goods. Some have up to nine
months of leadtime for materials
to flow through the chain.
Long chains can still be efficient because there is minimal inventory
and smooth flows through the
product chain. So
then, what is the problem?
It lies in the supply chain’s basic premise. Supply chains are based
on the fundamental principal of demand. And for the supply chain
to work, three demand principles must be known, understood
and managed. These
three
important principles are:
1)
DEMAND IS STABLE
2)
DEMAND IS FORECASTABLE
3)
DEMAND IS GROWING If
you break any of these
principles, you break one of the principles of demand and, quite
frankly, you break the chain. This
really is no different from
a chain letter. If you don’t send
the letter on, you break the chain and it stops and fails. The entire
downstream chain mail will
never exist. You
also can call it the domino theory. Start a line of dominos
tumbling. Then, remove a domino upstream before it is tipped over. The
tumbling action will stop
at that removal point. Momentum
is halted. I
believe the same scenario can occur in a supply chain. Here
is how the chain letter
or the domino theory works in
the supply chain. Imagine that
you are the second-to-last link
in the nine-month-long supply
chain and the last customer
cancels the order and the
relationship without any warning. This occurs in the middle of
what you thought was a
long-term contractual relationship. (Hey, this can and does happen.) Immediately,
you now have nine months of product coming at you and no customer. You
have three choices. You can:
• find another customer, real fast;
• try to cancel all the orders upstream in the supply chain and leave
everyone else in the chain scrambling to get rid of the
inventory of half-finished products;
• or, go bankrupt by owning
the entire inventory and having
no customers to sell those products. I’ve
seen all three scenarios
happen. What can you do to protect yourself? You need to see the other
side, or the down side, of supply chain management so that you can
avoid the pitfalls of supply chain in
a down economy. Supply
chain is like a tug-of-war. With all of your team members pulling in
the same direction and with the same force, it works. If the team is
disjointed, the chain is weak and you lose. The
bottom line of my lesson today is this: If one link in
the supply chain fails to meet their requirements, the chain will
collapse. I
believe this is a key to what
happened in our current business downturn. As customers quit
buying and/or reduced their orders, the decrease into the system
became the weak link and the
supply chain began to fail.
When chain links began to cut inventories and increase the
time length of the chain, the
entire chain failed. Remember,
the overall strength
is determined by its weakest link.
Do
you want to trust your
company’s business health to the weakest link? Find your weak link
in the chain and put strategies
in place to protect yourself in
the event of failure.
R.T. "Chris" Christensen is the
director of the University of Wisconsin School of Business' operations
management program. If you have an inventory management question, contact Coach
Christensen by phone at 608-441-7326 or e-mail cchristensen@execed.bus.wisc.edu.
This article appeared in the December 2002/January
2003 issue of
MRO Today
magazine. Copyright 2003.
Back
to top
Back to MRO Coach archives
|