Forecasting
made easy
by R.T. "Chris" Christensen
Now that I have your attention from the
catchy headline, let me be the first to break your bubble. There is no
way to make forecasting easy.
What I am going to do over the next few
articles, though, is describe the different types of forecast tools,
along with their strengths and weaknesses.
Forecasting isn’t easy, but with the
right forecast tool, you can make a serious impact on your forecast
capabilities. I won’t be talking about the different software
programs available as forecasting tools. There are so many of them
that just listing them would be nearly impossible.
What I will do is provide a discussion
of the different types of forecasting methods. This means that I will
show you how the calculations work, so that you get an understanding
of how the math is done. This way, you can determine the forecast
system that best fits your company and its needs.
A few things are needed to help us get
started in looking at developing a forecast tool that is suitable for
your operation.
One thing you need to do is examine the
possibility of using more than one forecast tool. Most consultants or
systems providers will generally try to use the same forecast tool for
all your needs.
This generally does not work well. What
it does is make the consultants’/system providers’ life easier
because there is little effort in the implementation process and a
high return in the consulting fee. It’s a good revenue-generating
tool for them and you are paying for it.
So, why shouldn’t you get a
one-size-fits-all tool? It’s your money, so why not select the best
forecast tool that fits the different classifications of your
inventory?
If you follow this Coach series,
you’ll remember reading the piece on categorizing inventory by use
rate and cost (visit Coach Christensen's archives on this site to
refresh your memory). This is the A/B/C classification, and what we do
is separate the significant few from the trivial many.
Studies have shown that 80 percent of
the money spent on inventory items is focused on approximately 20
percent of the part numbers. This being true, you just might want to
use a sophisticated forecast tool on the items that you spend the
significant portion of your inventory dollars.
On the lower-volume inventory, where
you spend fewer dollars, you could use a simpler and possibly
better-suited forecast tool.
Mid-range inventory may fall into a
category that could use a fairly complex forecast tool that could be
cost effective for that inventory category.
And, when it comes to the critical and
major items you have in your inventory, you are looking at a group of
parts in inventory that cannot and should not be forecast.
For a fifth category, you have those
parts in the system that have no predictable use pattern. For whatever
reason, they must fall in the category of being unforecastable.
Doesn’t it make sense to use
different forecast methods for different inventory class types? I
believe it does.
But no matter what group of forecasting
systems that you select, the one thing you must remember is that it is
you who must enter costs, use patterns, use rates, safety stock
levels, service levels, and all other historical and future use rates
into the forecast system for it to work. This is not included in the
software.
Forecasting programs are highly
reliable and sophisticated for the things that they do. However, all
they do is incorporate math on the numbers you enter into the
program.
What you will read in my upcoming MRO
Coach inventory articles is how these forecast tools work and how to
interpret the forecast that they make.
R.T. "Chris" Christensen
is the director of the University of Wisconsin School of Business'
operations management program. If you have an inventory management
question, contact Coach Christensen by phone at 608-441-7326 or e-mail
cchristensen@execed.bus.wisc.edu.
This
article appeared in the December 2001/January 2002 issue of MRO Today
magazine. Copyright 2002.Back to top
Back to MRO Coach archives
|